Positivism vs interpretivism? Structure vs agency? Get to grips with sociology’s key debates and the theoretical tensions shaping the discipline.
The National Student Survey is usually read as a scoreboard for teaching quality. This article argues that the NSS is better understood sociologically: not just as a measure of student experience, but as an instrument that shapes institutional behaviour.
Continue reading
Sociology is not just about what we study, but how we think we can know anything about the social world. This explainer introduces four major epistemological approaches – positivism, interpretivism, critical realism and pragmatism – and shows how each one answers basic questions about reality, knowledge and methods. Aimed at undergraduate sociology students, it offers a clear map of the terrain and helps you understand why different writers disagree about what counts as good evidence or explanation.
Continue reading
League tables and Ofsted reports matter, but school and university choices are often decided on the grapevine. This piece shows how parent networks, WhatsApp chats and “hot” knowledge quietly reproduce advantage—and why first-in-family and working-class students are left with thinner information.
Continue reading
This article develops quiet neurodivergence as a way of naming how some neurodivergent people appear to cope in education, work and civic life while absorbing hidden costs in masking, energy use and burnout. Drawing on neurodiversity, spoon theory, stigma and camouflaging research, and critical disability studies, it argues that quiet neurodivergence is produced by neuronormative institutions and patterned by class, race, gender and access to diagnosis.
Continue reading
A clear, student-friendly exploration of reflexivity in sociology, explaining how researchers’ positions, perspectives, and power relations shape knowledge production — and why acknowledging this makes research more rigorous, not more biased.
Continue reading
Many sociology students confuse methodology with method—but understanding the difference is essential for credible, coherent research. This guide explains both terms, shows how they connect to ontology and epistemology, and offers practical tips and examples for designing robust sociological studies.
Continue reading
This essay critiques a Times article that blames academics for enabling ‘woke ideology’ in higher education. While acknowledging the real issue of intolerance toward dissent, it highlights the article’s reliance on caricature, selective evidence, and polemic rather than balanced analysis.
Continue reading
Dutch philosopher Gert Biesta critiques how education has shifted from ethical formation to outcome-focused learning. His concept of subjectification offers a compelling vision for educators seeking a more human-centred, democratic practice.
Continue reading
Doctoral progress reviews are framed as supportive and developmental. Yet for candidates pursuing reflexive, critical, or non-linear research, they often become spaces of misrecognition—where methodological ambiguity is pathologised, and intellectual risk is penalised. This article interrogates how audit logics, shaped by structures like the REF, reframe scholarly inquiry as compliance. It argues for a higher education culture that values complexity, temporal nuance, and epistemic diversity over bureaucratic legibility.
Continue reading
Explore how digital media, educational trends, and ideological conformity are eroding critical thinking. This article examines the sociological roots of this decline and argues for the urgent revival of independent thought as a civic responsibility.
Continue reading
